WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.880
[MUSIC PLAYING]

00:00:09.700 --> 00:00:13.360
Editing is at
its essential core

00:00:13.360 --> 00:00:15.370
the distillation of
the material you've

00:00:15.370 --> 00:00:17.340
collected into a coherent story.

00:00:17.340 --> 00:00:21.310
So you can go back
to human life.

00:00:21.310 --> 00:00:23.590
How is your day,
someone ask you?

00:00:23.590 --> 00:00:26.830
And you immediately
begin to edit that

00:00:26.830 --> 00:00:29.950
into a coherent narrative
of what took place.

00:00:29.950 --> 00:00:30.000
You do not spend 24 hours
telling that person what

00:00:30.000 --> 00:00:33.370
You do not spend 24 hours
telling that person what

00:00:33.370 --> 00:00:34.510
your day was like.

00:00:34.510 --> 00:00:38.290
But you want to-- you
hopefully have collected

00:00:38.290 --> 00:00:40.720
24 hours worth of
material in order

00:00:40.720 --> 00:00:43.570
to be able to answer the
question, how is your day.

00:00:43.570 --> 00:00:45.250
That's all that editing is.

00:00:45.250 --> 00:00:50.080
It's taking the seemingly
random chaos of events

00:00:50.080 --> 00:00:52.000
and ordering it into a story.

00:00:58.396 --> 00:01:00.000
You can look at our
cutting room floor.

00:01:00.000 --> 00:01:00.020
You can look at our
cutting room floor.

00:01:00.020 --> 00:01:01.460
The proverbial
cutting room floor

00:01:01.460 --> 00:01:02.990
isn't filled with bad stuff.

00:01:02.990 --> 00:01:05.540
It's filled with great stuff
that you would look and go,

00:01:05.540 --> 00:01:07.170
wow, you're an idiot.

00:01:07.170 --> 00:01:08.750
Why isn't that in
the final film?

00:01:08.750 --> 00:01:11.760
But if I could put it
back into the final film,

00:01:11.760 --> 00:01:15.320
I'd show you the way that
wonderful scene de-stabilized

00:01:15.320 --> 00:01:16.820
the arc of something better.

00:01:16.820 --> 00:01:20.420
Part of what I am is in some
ways a traffic cop, ultimately

00:01:20.420 --> 00:01:23.081
deciding what's going
to get into the film

00:01:23.081 --> 00:01:24.830
and what's not going
to get into the film.

00:01:24.830 --> 00:01:28.070
And that makes it an
incredible burden.

00:01:28.070 --> 00:01:30.000
Nothing in the hunter
gathering portion

00:01:30.000 --> 00:01:30.620
Nothing in the hunter
gathering portion

00:01:30.620 --> 00:01:34.400
compares to what takes
place in the triage,

00:01:34.400 --> 00:01:37.580
in the merciless
triage that everyone

00:01:37.580 --> 00:01:39.950
who wants to be a
filmmaker will come

00:01:39.950 --> 00:01:43.130
to have to face, that
you will have to kill,

00:01:43.130 --> 00:01:46.730
as they say in journalism,
all your little darlings.

00:01:46.730 --> 00:01:49.520
All those sentences that you
think are perfectly read,

00:01:49.520 --> 00:01:51.660
all that shot that you
think as you're taking it,

00:01:51.660 --> 00:01:54.200
oh, it's going to be
in the final film.

00:01:54.200 --> 00:01:57.350
And be willing to sacrifice
them in the service of something

00:01:57.350 --> 00:02:00.000
else that has gone places that
you couldn't even imagine.

00:02:00.000 --> 00:02:00.470
else that has gone places that
you couldn't even imagine.

00:02:00.470 --> 00:02:03.410
And I think it's in some
ways having a kind of courage

00:02:03.410 --> 00:02:05.180
to make sure that
you permit yourself

00:02:05.180 --> 00:02:07.580
to let it go in a
direction that you didn't

00:02:07.580 --> 00:02:08.960
think it was going to go.

00:02:08.960 --> 00:02:12.680
There is a huge amount of
humility at the end of the day

00:02:12.680 --> 00:02:15.170
that you begin to realize
this whole thing is about.

00:02:15.170 --> 00:02:17.630
It isn't about
imposing what you know.

00:02:17.630 --> 00:02:20.240
It's about acknowledging
what you don't know

00:02:20.240 --> 00:02:23.080
and asking of the material
what it might need.

00:02:23.080 --> 00:02:25.550
It doesn't mean that you
don't impose yourself.

00:02:25.550 --> 00:02:26.510
You do.

00:02:26.510 --> 00:02:30.000
But you've got to have an equal
ingredient of humility that

00:02:30.000 --> 00:02:30.560
But you've got to have an equal
ingredient of humility that

00:02:30.560 --> 00:02:32.930
permits that material
to speak to you

00:02:32.930 --> 00:02:35.700
and tell us what it
needs to make it better.

00:02:42.360 --> 00:02:45.980
We use all the time in the
editing room musical analogies.

00:02:45.980 --> 00:02:47.630
Hold that a beat longer.

00:02:47.630 --> 00:02:50.870
Hold that sentence go beat beat.

00:02:50.870 --> 00:02:53.720
We have adopted without
really know what we're

00:02:53.720 --> 00:02:55.520
talking about musical ideas.

00:02:55.520 --> 00:02:57.590
Because if you think
about it, Wynton Marsalis

00:02:57.590 --> 00:03:00.000
says that music is the
art of the invisible.

00:03:00.000 --> 00:03:00.080
says that music is the
art of the invisible.

00:03:00.080 --> 00:03:02.720
You can hear one note
and then a second note,

00:03:02.720 --> 00:03:05.150
and something more has happened.

00:03:05.150 --> 00:03:06.400
And that happens with words.

00:03:06.400 --> 00:03:07.940
It happens with images.

00:03:07.940 --> 00:03:11.100
Music is the fastest
way to your heart.

00:03:11.100 --> 00:03:14.450
And so I think, as we begin
to edit, I find it helpful--

00:03:14.450 --> 00:03:16.010
I think you would
find it helpful--

00:03:16.010 --> 00:03:19.070
to think about what these
things represent in kind

00:03:19.070 --> 00:03:21.050
of almost musical notations.

00:03:21.050 --> 00:03:23.430
I don't know anything
about music in that way.

00:03:23.430 --> 00:03:24.650
But I know enough--

00:03:24.650 --> 00:03:25.790
and you know enough--

00:03:25.790 --> 00:03:27.230
to be able to employ that.

00:03:27.230 --> 00:03:30.000
So a shot may be an 8th
note, or a 16th note,

00:03:30.000 --> 00:03:30.710
So a shot may be an 8th
note, or a 16th note,

00:03:30.710 --> 00:03:34.280
or a 30 second note,
depending on how long it's on.

00:03:34.280 --> 00:03:37.520
It may be that that line of
narration is so dramatic that

00:03:37.520 --> 00:03:40.467
you need to, at that
period, at that rest,

00:03:40.467 --> 00:03:42.050
you would say at the
end of the note--

00:03:42.050 --> 00:03:43.250
the period after the note--

00:03:43.250 --> 00:03:45.220
to hold that.

00:03:45.220 --> 00:03:47.180
One beat, two beat, cut.

00:03:53.072 --> 00:03:55.760
I often try to respect
the word and try

00:03:55.760 --> 00:03:58.430
to get to the end of
a phrase or a clause,

00:03:58.430 --> 00:04:00.000
where there might be a comma in
the script, before I would cut.

00:04:00.000 --> 00:04:03.380
where there might be a comma in
the script, before I would cut.

00:04:03.380 --> 00:04:04.790
That's not always the case.

00:04:04.790 --> 00:04:09.430
But for the most part, I think
that, like musical phrases,

00:04:09.430 --> 00:04:11.330
I kind of want a pace to it.

00:04:11.330 --> 00:04:13.580
And then I can increase
the pace of it.

00:04:13.580 --> 00:04:15.320
I can slow down that pace.

00:04:15.320 --> 00:04:16.790
We can do different things.

00:04:16.790 --> 00:04:20.390
What you're trying to do is
reconcile a word, or at least

00:04:20.390 --> 00:04:23.450
a tension, between the
word and the reception

00:04:23.450 --> 00:04:28.100
of those words, which is a
singular oral experience,

00:04:28.100 --> 00:04:30.000
and then the reception of
the visual information.

00:04:30.000 --> 00:04:32.060
and then the reception of
the visual information.

00:04:32.060 --> 00:04:33.860
How long it takes
to read an image.

00:04:33.860 --> 00:04:37.190
How much more meaning
accrues during the duration

00:04:37.190 --> 00:04:38.300
of that shot.

00:04:38.300 --> 00:04:42.650
And if you, in some
ways, set up oppositions

00:04:42.650 --> 00:04:44.720
where you're kind of
forcing the viewer

00:04:44.720 --> 00:04:47.180
to choose listening
over watching,

00:04:47.180 --> 00:04:50.540
or choose watching over
listening, you've failed.

00:04:50.540 --> 00:04:52.640
So I'm just looking
for that place

00:04:52.640 --> 00:04:56.930
where you have not accentuated
these moments of tension.

00:04:56.930 --> 00:04:59.750
You want to find a pace and
rhythm that permits you.

00:04:59.750 --> 00:05:00.000
If that means cutting at the
end of the phrase, so be it.

00:05:00.000 --> 00:05:02.970
If that means cutting at the
end of the phrase, so be it.

00:05:02.970 --> 00:05:05.960
But that may be the
phrase in music too.

00:05:05.960 --> 00:05:07.340
But there are no rules.

00:05:07.340 --> 00:05:09.682
I mean, sometimes that
works beautifully.

00:05:15.950 --> 00:05:19.790
The pace of a
particular scene is

00:05:19.790 --> 00:05:22.400
about what all of the
elements are telling you.

00:05:22.400 --> 00:05:26.390
Obviously, what the music is is
hugely important to what it is.

00:05:26.390 --> 00:05:30.000
And what's happening in the
scene, what the action is.

00:05:30.000 --> 00:05:30.230
And what's happening in the
scene, what the action is.

00:05:30.230 --> 00:05:33.560
You know, people reading at
home doesn't have the same pace

00:05:33.560 --> 00:05:34.760
as a battle scene.

00:05:34.760 --> 00:05:38.420
And at the same time, there
are moments within a battle,

00:05:38.420 --> 00:05:40.040
or at the end, or
at the beginning,

00:05:40.040 --> 00:05:42.680
in which the pace is even
more stately than somebody

00:05:42.680 --> 00:05:43.490
reading at home.

00:05:43.490 --> 00:05:47.492
And so you have to be open to
what the scene itself deserves.

00:05:47.492 --> 00:05:49.700
It's like, when you speak
and you're telling somebody

00:05:49.700 --> 00:05:52.820
a story, you'll find the
best story tellers often

00:05:52.820 --> 00:05:55.850
begin to lower their
voices and lean back

00:05:55.850 --> 00:05:59.480
and start to tell you a story,
and that forces you to lean in.

00:05:59.480 --> 00:06:00.000
And so if you've got the
control and the mastery

00:06:00.000 --> 00:06:02.930
And so if you've got the
control and the mastery

00:06:02.930 --> 00:06:07.250
of these elements, you're just
inviting people to lean in.

00:06:07.250 --> 00:06:10.520
Now, these are not
MTV fast cut videos,

00:06:10.520 --> 00:06:14.090
except I can show you the
middle of the Tet Offensive

00:06:14.090 --> 00:06:17.330
from the Vietnam War,
and that sucker is really

00:06:17.330 --> 00:06:22.410
moving as fast, if not faster,
than any music video I've seen.

00:06:22.410 --> 00:06:27.094
And that's what it
told us it needed.

00:06:27.094 --> 00:06:30.000
[EXPLOSIONS, SHOUTING COMMANDS]

00:06:30.000 --> 00:06:30.990
[EXPLOSIONS, SHOUTING COMMANDS]

00:06:35.860 --> 00:06:38.024
NARRATOR: The
fighting continued.

00:06:38.024 --> 00:06:40.916
[GUNFIRE, SCREAMS]

00:06:44.300 --> 00:06:48.140
We had to blow our way through
every wall of every house,

00:06:48.140 --> 00:06:50.300
one marine remembered.

00:06:50.300 --> 00:06:53.900
It's a shame we had to
damage such a beautiful city.

00:06:53.900 --> 00:06:55.820
[MUSIC PLAYING]

00:07:00.620 --> 00:07:04.250
In the last month
of editing, there

00:07:04.250 --> 00:07:07.430
are sometimes some big
and scary decisions

00:07:07.430 --> 00:07:09.320
to make additions,
more importantly,

00:07:09.320 --> 00:07:10.890
subtractions from it.

00:07:10.890 --> 00:07:13.310
But most of it is
opening up to frames.

00:07:13.310 --> 00:07:15.650
That's a twelfth of a second.

00:07:15.650 --> 00:07:17.000
Opening up six frames.

00:07:17.000 --> 00:07:18.890
That's a fourth of a second.

00:07:18.890 --> 00:07:20.570
You can say that's
imperceptible,

00:07:20.570 --> 00:07:26.630
but when you are as engaged in
the editing process with us,

00:07:26.630 --> 00:07:27.260
it's true.

00:07:27.260 --> 00:07:29.060
You feel it at that level.

00:07:29.060 --> 00:07:30.000
I once was working on my
very first film in our cabin,

00:07:30.000 --> 00:07:32.840
I once was working on my
very first film in our cabin,

00:07:32.840 --> 00:07:38.540
and my editor, who was soon
to be my first wife, said,

00:07:38.540 --> 00:07:42.110
I'm going to cut one frame
out of this hour-long film

00:07:42.110 --> 00:07:44.990
on the "Brooklyn
Bridge," mostly archival.

00:07:44.990 --> 00:07:45.920
And just tell me.

00:07:45.920 --> 00:07:46.550
And I found it.

00:07:46.550 --> 00:07:49.178
I knew exactly where it was.

00:07:49.178 --> 00:07:54.410
I was so anxiously but
also powerfully engaged

00:07:54.410 --> 00:07:56.720
in the subject,
that I would wish

00:07:56.720 --> 00:08:00.000
that on every single one
of you, that at some point,

00:08:00.000 --> 00:08:01.710
that on every single one
of you, that at some point,

00:08:01.710 --> 00:08:04.770
in some aspect of
what you were doing,

00:08:04.770 --> 00:08:06.750
that you would,
either specifically

00:08:06.750 --> 00:08:10.080
that or the equivalent
of that, know the frame.

00:08:10.080 --> 00:08:12.870
That's being the
princess with the pea.

00:08:12.870 --> 00:08:14.730
You know, however
many mattresses,

00:08:14.730 --> 00:08:17.070
you still feel that pea.

00:08:17.070 --> 00:08:21.240
And that's the kind of
sensitivity and awareness

00:08:21.240 --> 00:08:23.010
you have to awaken in yourself.

00:08:23.010 --> 00:08:24.390
It isn't just a job.

00:08:24.390 --> 00:08:25.500
It isn't just a widget.

00:08:25.500 --> 00:08:27.270
If you chose to do
that, that's great.

00:08:27.270 --> 00:08:29.520
And I can help you
with some outer stuff.

00:08:29.520 --> 00:08:30.000
But if it really
wants to be something

00:08:30.000 --> 00:08:31.680
But if it really
wants to be something

00:08:31.680 --> 00:08:34.980
that changes you and
changes other people,

00:08:34.980 --> 00:08:36.672
then, at some point,
in some aspect

00:08:36.672 --> 00:08:38.130
of what you're
doing, you're, going

00:08:38.130 --> 00:08:40.091
to have to say
under 10 mattresses,

00:08:40.091 --> 00:08:41.549
I didn't have a
good night's sleep.

00:08:41.549 --> 00:08:44.130
There was a pea
under the mattress.

00:08:44.130 --> 00:08:47.700
And somebody just took
out a frame from my film.

00:08:47.700 --> 00:08:48.630
And I want it back.

00:08:55.490 --> 00:08:57.990
The adage is that you
never finish a work of art.

00:08:57.990 --> 00:08:59.240
You abandon it.

00:08:59.240 --> 00:09:00.000
But there is a sense that
you do get to a point

00:09:00.000 --> 00:09:01.880
But there is a sense that
you do get to a point

00:09:01.880 --> 00:09:03.980
where you can whittle
this stick down to nothing

00:09:03.980 --> 00:09:05.077
and it ought to stop.

00:09:05.077 --> 00:09:06.410
That the scenes are all working.

00:09:06.410 --> 00:09:08.039
Yes, you can tinker
and you can fuss.

00:09:08.039 --> 00:09:10.580
And I've seen what's happened
when you fuss too much that you

00:09:10.580 --> 00:09:12.020
end up saying,
well, let's go back

00:09:12.020 --> 00:09:15.710
to the way we were last
week because I think

00:09:15.710 --> 00:09:18.620
we've like over done it here.

00:09:18.620 --> 00:09:20.070
And that happens.

00:09:20.070 --> 00:09:23.360
But I do think,
in some ways, you

00:09:23.360 --> 00:09:26.250
have to let this thing,
this imperfect thing.

00:09:26.250 --> 00:09:28.850
There's nothing will be perfect.

00:09:28.850 --> 00:09:29.772
Go.

00:09:29.772 --> 00:09:30.000
And just say that, you know,
it's like a photo album.

00:09:30.000 --> 00:09:31.980
And just say that, you know,
it's like a photo album.

00:09:31.980 --> 00:09:33.100
Like, I can go
back into the '70s

00:09:33.100 --> 00:09:35.300
and I can see myself in
these bell-bottom pants,

00:09:35.300 --> 00:09:39.360
and this Paisley patterned
shirt with big wide collar.

00:09:39.360 --> 00:09:42.980
And you go, oh, my god,
that's so horrible.

00:09:42.980 --> 00:09:45.290
But you never take the
picture out and tear it up.

00:09:45.290 --> 00:09:46.440
It's true.

00:09:46.440 --> 00:09:47.960
And I can look at
an earlier film

00:09:47.960 --> 00:09:49.490
and say, wow, that's
still working.

00:09:49.490 --> 00:09:51.281
Or I can go boy, I
wouldn't have done that.

00:09:51.281 --> 00:09:53.810
But I would never for a moment
think of going into that film

00:09:53.810 --> 00:09:57.170
and changing the length of that
fade, or removing that fade,

00:09:57.170 --> 00:09:58.895
or making the dissolved
longer or shorter

00:09:58.895 --> 00:10:00.000
or getting rid of the
dissolved, or changing

00:10:00.000 --> 00:10:01.130
or getting rid of the
dissolved, or changing

00:10:01.130 --> 00:10:04.430
the font on a graphic,
or making it smaller.

00:10:04.430 --> 00:10:06.170
All of stuff I've
thought about as I

00:10:06.170 --> 00:10:10.460
looked at "Brooklyn Bridge"
as it was recently restored.

00:10:10.460 --> 00:10:11.360
But it was just me.

00:10:11.360 --> 00:10:13.590
And the audience didn't care.

00:10:13.590 --> 00:10:14.530
They liked it.

00:10:14.530 --> 00:10:15.290
OK.

00:10:15.290 --> 00:10:16.340
Just-- you've won.

00:10:16.340 --> 00:10:17.190
Declare victory.

00:10:17.190 --> 00:10:18.110
It's OK.

00:10:18.110 --> 00:10:18.979
Don't fuss.

00:10:18.979 --> 00:10:20.270
And that's what you want to do.

00:10:20.270 --> 00:10:22.130
At some point, you go,
you know what, this

00:10:22.130 --> 00:10:24.760
is what we can do right now.

